J Med Microbiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McTaggart, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McTaggart, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McTaggart, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, T. S.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 30, Issue 4 253-266, Copyright © 1989 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Is resistance to novobiocin a reliable test for confirmation of the identification of Staphylococcus saprophyticus?

L. A. McTaggart and T. S. Elliott
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Edgbaston, Birmingham.

Staphylococcus saprophyticus, a coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CNS), causes acute urinary tract infection predominantly in young women (15-30 years). In the clinical microbiology laboratory identification and differentiation of S. saprophyticus from other CNS usually depends solely upon the demonstration of resistance to the antimicrobial agent novobiocin. Phenotypic characteristics of 36 novobiocin-resistant CNS isolated from the urine of patients with acute urinary tract infections were further analysed and the homogeneity of the isolates assessed. The organisms were speciated by the API STAPH identification system. Twenty-one isolates were S. saprophyticus (p greater than or equal to 97%), and there was one strain each of S. epidermidis, S. hominis and S. simulans (p greater than or equal to 97%). Of the remainder, three isolates were unidentifiable and a further nine had the characteristics associated with more than one species of CNS. Additional tests, including carbohydrate fermentation, antibiotic sensitivity and fluorogenic substrate utilisation, were performed on all isolates. Computer analysis of the results confirmed that testing for resistance to novobiocin selects a heterogeneous group of CNS composed of several different species.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1989 Society for General Microbiology.