J Med Microbiol NEW Faster Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elhag, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahajan, K. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elhag, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahajan, K. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Elhag, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahajan, K. K.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 24, Issue 2 125-131, Copyright © 1987 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Difficulties in the serodiagnosis of infection with the fragilis group of Bacteroides

K. M. Elhag, A. M. Bahar and K. K. Mahajan
Department of Microbiology, University of Kuwait.

Bacteroides antibodies were studied in sera from 74 patients infected with the fragilis group of Bacteroides and 74 healthy control persons, by immunofluorescence of 26 different serotypes of the fragilis group. Antibodies were present at titres of 10-320 in 65 (88%) patients and 50 (68%) controls (p less than 0.01). Titres of greater than or equal to 80 were demonstrated in sera of 38 (51%) patients and 5 (7%) controls (p less than 0.01). Specific IgM antibodies were detected in sera of 42 (57%) patients at a geometric mean titre (GMT) of 30, and 8 (11%) controls at a GMT of 11 (p less than 0.01). High antibody titres as well as specific IgM were found in 32 (43%) patients, while none of the controls showed such a combination (p less than 0.01). The majority of positive patients' sera (57%) reacted with five or more serotypes, whereas most positive control sera (51%) reacted against only one or two serotypes (p less than 0.01). A selected combination of serotypes not reacting with the control sera showed positive reactions with 52 (70%) patients' sera. These findings may be useful in devising schemes for the serodiagnosis of infection caused by the fragilis group of Bacteroides. However, there are indications of geographic variation in prevalence of serotypes, which may prevent the development of a single universal scheme.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1987 Society for General Microbiology.