J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, M. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Patrick, S.
Right arrow Articles by Larkin, M. J.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 17, Issue 3 237-246, Copyright © 1984 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

The growth and survival of capsulate and non-capsulate Bacteroides fragilis in vivo and in vitro

S. Patrick, J. H. Reid and M. J. Larkin

The growth of capsulate and non- capsulate Bacteroides fragilis in chambers implanted in the mouse peritoneal cavity was compared. Capsulate and essentially non- capsulate (less than 1% capsulate ) populations of B. fragilis strains NCTC9343 and NCTC10584 consistently grew exponentially to greater than 10(9) cfu/ml within 24 h in vivo, and low numbers of capsulate bacteria were maintained in the essentially non- capsulate population; however, the degree of capsulation of the capsulate population decreased by more than 60%. B. fragilis ATCC23745 differed from strains NCTC9343 and NCTC10584 in that growth was unpredictable and only occurred in some of the implanted chambers. Capsule production by cells of strain ATCC23745 varied from chamber to chamber: sometimes the proportion of capsulate cells increased after prolonged implantation. This could occur with either an increase or decrease in viable numbers in vivo and also after in-vitro incubation of this strain in chambers. The survival of capsulate and non- capsulate B. fragilis strains NCTC9343 and ATCC23745 was compared in aerobic and anaerobic conditions in vitro. In anaerobic conditions, capsulate and non- capsulate strain NCTC9343 survived equally well, whereas capsulate ATCC23745 survived better than its non- capsulate variants. Capsulate populations of both strains survived better than non- capsulate in aerobic conditions.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1984 Society for General Microbiology.