J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cafferkey, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cafferkey, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cafferkey, M. T.
Right arrow Articles by Pomeroy, H.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 16, Issue 2 117-127, Copyright © 1983 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Gentamicin and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Dublin hospitals: clinical and laboratory studies

M. T. Cafferkey, R. Hone, F. R. Falkiner, C. T. Keane and H. Pomeroy

Strains of Staphylococcus aureus resistant to gentamicin and methicillin first appeared in Dublin hospitals in 1976, and rapidly became widely disseminated. The number of patients infected or colonised increased throughout the period of study, especially in 1979 and 1980. Most isolates were from burns, surgical wounds and traumatic skin lesions. During the 12 months after first isolation of these multiply antibiotic resistant strains, colonisation or minor infection was the usual event. Invasive infection such as bacteraemia, deep wound sepsis and osteomyelitis was rarely seen. Subsequently, as the number of patients from whom these organisms were isolated increased, bacteraemia and other severe infection became more common. The predominant phage type of S. aureus changed with the progression of the outbreak. Isolates of different phage type were sometimes found in a single lesion, or in different sites in one patient. By the second half of 1980, most isolates were untypable or typed only with an experimental phage.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1983 Society for General Microbiology.