J Med Microbiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R.

The Journal of Medical Microbiology, Vol 14, Issue 1 63-76, Copyright © 1981 by Society for General Microbiology


JOURNAL ARTICLE

Neuraminidase production by Bacteroidaceae

A. G. Fraser and R. Brown

The production of neuraminidase (EC 3.2.1.18) by 77 strains of Bacteroidaceae was investigated by techniques previously used to study neuraminidase production by clostridia. Conditions for culture and assay of Bacteroides fragilis neuraminidase were characterised. The enzyme is predominantly cell associated; it is not calcium dependent and the pH optimum for its production is c. 4.5. Most neuraminidase-positive Bacteroides strains produced the enzyme well in the test media but a few strains failed to produce it consistently in one or other of the media. Because of these occasional variations, strains were grown and tested in at least two media before being defined as neuraminidase negative. Within the B. fragilis group of species, B. fragilis, B. vulgatus, B. distasonis, B. ovatus, B. thetaiotaomicron and B. variabilis were neuraminidase positive while B. eggerthii, B. uniformis and B. splanchnicus were negative. Two subspecies of B. melaninogenicus (ss. melaninogenicus and ss. levii) were positive but the other (ss. intermedius) was negative. Strains of B. oralis and B. bivius produced the enzyme while B. ruminicola, B. disiens, B. asaccharolyticus and B. corrodens did not. The microaerophilic B. ochraceus were also positive. None of the Fusobacterium or Leptotrichia species tested produced neuraminidase. Our results for neuraminidase production are consistent for all strains of each species examined and we suggest that tests for neuraminidase production would be a valuable addition to biochemical tests currently used in taxonomic studies of the Bacteroidaceae.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
INT J SYST EVOL MICROBIOL J MED MICROBIOL MICROBIOLOGY J GEN VIROL ALL SGM JOURNALS
Copyright © 1981 Society for General Microbiology.